Desertec Pt.2: What About Africa Below The Desert?

And what of Africa below the Desert?

OKSolar - world_solar_radiation

The FAQ on Desertec’s site is clear about the geographical scope of the project: Europe, Middle East and North Africa.

Your approach includes only North Africa. What about the rest of Africa and other countries?

  • For a cooperation and integration into the European grid, MENA is – because of its proximity to Europe – obviously more suitable, than Central or South Africa
  • Renewables in general and CSP in particular, are also suitable for the rest of Africa and it will profit by the cost reductions developed in the north.
  • Central Africa has large hydropower resources considered by the North African countries (eg. Egypt) as a strategic reserve for its electricity supply. If North Africa, however, uses its own solar resources, Central Africa remains its most important resource.
  • We also campaign there and in China, Australia, America and India for a realisation of DESERTEC “Clean Power from Deserts,” but our resources are limited.
  • That is why we are founding regional DESERTEC Networks, which can benefit from our know-how and the studies.

So, Desertec is a commercial deal between the Western European energy giants, who want to capitalize on CSP technology, and the leaders of MENA countries, who have vast desert lands in close proximity to the European power grids.

It would be naive for the excluded African countries to expect Desertec to consider countries too far away to be of use for their primary goal of adding MENA desert energy to their existing stocks.

Fortunately, most of the continent enjoys solar radiation levels suited to CSP technology. The energy potential remains the same without Desertec. However, if we want to explore CSP technology, we have to court other CSP partners willing to make their profit through the sale of know-how, or co-ownership of African energy companies.

Do such partners exist? Yes, the  Medium and Small Scale Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Platform is one example.

The idea of Africa South of the Sahara as an unprofitable area of operation – as implied by Desertec – is a fallacy. One need only look at the enormous profits and growth mobile telecommunication companies have experienced in the region. Their success lies in having jumped in where state-operated landline systems had failed, leaving a poulace willing to pay any price to communicate. The same situation prevails now in the field of electrical power.

What are our options?

The most important thing to do is not to be drawn into technology wars (PV-technology vs. CSP). We are simply not equipped to make an imprint there. The African strategy should hinge on two points:

1. Catch up with PV-technology and equip the common man so that we can reap the benefits of advances made in Europe, the USA and Asia;

2. Work with positively inclined CSP developers and entrepreneurs who are amenable to investing in Africa South of The Sahara. Emphasis should be to decentralize and reduce dependence on long, vulnerable power transportation lines as envisioned by Desertec. The reason why we should apply the technology at small to medium scale should be obvious: we do not have the massive capital or intra-national grid cohesion that is needed for that setup.

Challenge number one is to get our policy-makers to take solar more seriously than they have done to date.

Desertec represents the second phase a solar revolution that Africa has practically missed out on. In the past decade, in what we could term Phase 1, the USA, Europe and parts of Asia have adopted PV based solar energy so well that it is no longer a curious conservationists’ concept. In three years or so, grid-parity will be achieved, a point at which PV power pricing equals or falls under grid-power.

One thing is clear. If we allow Desertec to take off without us, we will see Africa split in two by energy and progress, and people driven yet farther towards the margins of the global economy because they failed to use their solar resource transform their energy supplies.

For further reading a discussion on the technology and possibilities of CSP, I recommend the Desertec-Africa site.

Desertec Pt. 1: Is solar turning geopolitical?

Preamble

Many conflicts in the world today are related to the control and domination of  energy resources, especially fossil fuels: Iraq vs. the world, Afghanistan as an access route to fields afar, Russia vs, Georgia, The Niger delta, ….

The sun cannot be dammed or cornered for the benefit of a region, company or individual. It shines for all, and anybody with the means is free to use it as he or she wishes. It is also virtually limitless.

Recent developments in solar energy have demonstrated that the ability to generate one’s own power from the sun translates into great freedom and progress, besides being a welcome relief to our environment.  The idea of decentralization is seriously challenging the position of energy conglomerates globally.

Is Desertec an expensive attempt to restore the role of the central power company and to draw geopolitical boundaries around the greatest free resource on earth?

So, What’s Desertec?

Desertec is a project involving the construction of a network of solar-thermal electricity generation plants in the deserts of North Africa. High Voltage Direct Current transmission technology via underground and undersea cabling will deliver the electricity to Western European grids on the other side of the Mediterrenean Sea.

Map of the Sahara and Western Europe showing planned power grid.

Map of the Sahara and Western Europe showing planned power grid.

Once up and running, the project plans to supply up to 15% of Europe’s needs and also serve lands from which the power originates.

The initial price tag on this project is €400 billion.

The genesis of the project was the founding of the Trans-Mediterranean Renewable Energy Cooperation (TREC) in 2003, an initiative of The Club of Rome, the Jordanian National Energy Research  Center NERC, and the Hamburg Climate Protection Foundation HKF.

Who’s Desertec?

While German multinationals dominate the list, the project is backed by an awe-inspiring collective of founders and sponsors, all with strong global history and presence in the Energy field:

On the other side of the Miditerreanen, the list of committed Middle-East and Africa (MENA) participants is not yet entirely clear, but is expected to include Morocco,  Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Palestine, Jordan, Yemen, United Arab Emirates and Bahrain.

Desertec has campaigned remarkably well to market its project; it is all over the web! According to their site, endorsements have been obtained from many quarters, including Greenpeace in a document entitled Global Concentrating Solar Power Outlook 2009.

I found no explicit endorsement of the Desertec concept on the Greenpeace site or in the document. The Greenpeace paper is an appraisal of CSP technology in general, which I believe can be applied in local and small-scale projects.

Critics and detractors

The foremost critic of the Desertec project today is Dr. Hermann Scheer German Social Democratic deputy and the man most credited with German’s  success in the renewable energy field.

Dr. Hermann Scheer- Renewable energy advocate

Dr. Hermann Scheer

Dr. Scheer is a strong proponent of decentralization of power. He has worked tirelessly to encourage the use of grid-tied PV systems and legislating generous feed-in tariffs that have made solar power an attractive option in Germany. Thanks to his efforts and those of other like him, the global market for PV panels and related products has grown tremendously, as witnessed in the 24th PV Conference and Exhibition in Hamburg (see previos blog).

The German approach has been emulated in many other countries with similar results.

[Significant note here: Dr. Herman favours photovoltaics, which turn light into electrical energy, while the proponents of Desertec, led by Dr. Gerhard Knies, mainly come from the world of CSP (Concentrated Solar Power), a technology that harnesses the heat of the sun.]

So, on which points does Dr. Scheer fault Desertec?

In an article entitled European power from the desert is a Fata Morgana, Dr. Scheer asserts that:

  • Inherently Eurocentric, Destertec aims to feed European power hunger instead of helping Africa attain energy self-sufficiency;
  • The €400 billion price-tag is extremely high, and planners understate the true price of infrastructure to Europe;
  • The projected 15% of European power demand Desertec intends to fill could easily be met through existing technology and infrastructure. He cites the German success: since 2000,  that same 15% has been achieved with a mere €80 billion;
  • Merits of decentralization have been demonstrated, while Desertec will result in base-power stations under controle of governments or multinational companies, a model that has vulnerabilities and negative implications for consumers;
  • The common desire of German municipalities is to work towards “100 per cent electricity supply generated from local and regional sources by 2030 at the latest”. The Renewable Energy Sources Act is already in place to ensure the success of the decentralization movement;
  • The ability of producers in a centralized system to pass added value on to the consumer is not guaranteed by Desertec, versus the benefits of  localised generation, where the value added directly accrues to the local producers.

Is this the voice of a man defending his political territory and technological preferences  to the hilt, or that of a sincere believer in affordable solar power for ALL? I hope that the latter case holds true, and that he can help achieve the results he has achieved in Germany in Africa and Kenya!

Desertec has a response to Dr. Scheer on their website.

*************************************************

Part 2 will examine the geo-political implications of Desertec, and what it all means to those below the Sahara desert.

http://www.hsh-nordbank.com/en/homekundenbereiche/homepage.jsp
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.